Man Of Steel
Today I'll be reviewing D.C.'s latest movie: Man Of Steel.
If you are new to this blog, please read my welcome to you first: http://screenwriterspov.blogspot.com/ thanks :)
First Off: The Age Rating and WHY;
First the down low: The MPAA hit this movie with a PG-13 rating. Now before you go bringing your 4
or 5 year old to the theater to see your childhood hero, let me explain why the
13 in PG-13 is important for this film. According to the MPAA report: "Man
of Steel is Rated PG-13 for intense sequences of sci-fi violence, action and
destruction, and for some language." Now having seen the movie I can
certainly agree with these terms. The action scenes throughout the movie are
just as epic and as intense as advertised, same as the action and destruction. I'll tell you this later but the special effects budget for this movie must have been huge. There are very few buildings that remain intact during this movie and as for the violence, you better sit far back or else you'll pull what I like to call a Willow Smith, my head was whipping back and forth as new surprises jumped out at every corner. If your child doesn't do well with sudden entrances, then this is not a movie they should see. Then there's the language. Having gone to High School I can say it's not as bad as that, BUT parents who are not comfortable with their children hearing words such as "shit","ass", "damn", "hell", or anything short of the F-bomb should not let their children see this movie. The director wanted to steer this movie towards something more realistic and unfortunately that includes adult language from much of the cast. Now a days PG-13 and R ratings are getting more and more blurred together in my opinion, not that Man of Steel is one of these movies, it clearly falls under its rating, but I believe it is a parents job to monitor what their young children watch and be proactive when planing a trip to the movies. Looking into what the movies specific rating includes should be one of those steps.
Told You I'd Get To This: Special Effects;
I will start off by saying this: The effects budget for this movie must have been larger than the U.S. National debt. All jokes aside this movie was full of effects. My personal favorite was the many alien ships that where portrayed in this film, the details on the ships where fantastic. I have not read the comic books, but I certainly hope the original fans feel that this movie did them justice. Then there's the explosions, and there where a lot of them, but somehow they could make each and every one look different. The battle scenes as a whole took my breath away. You could see individual bricks go flying from a collapsing building, or the view swirling of the clouds as Superman flew, even the shaking of the screen as you ran with civilians as the battle raged on around you. I have to say the 'civilian camera' effect is one of my favorites of all time. Its where you just literally take the camera and run with it, so it bounces as shakes and it gives you the feeling of actually being a civilian on the street. There where also many fantastic scenes of viewing Earth from space, all of which where absolutely beautiful. You could see the line of the Earth and our atmosphere in contrast to the darkness of space. If you have never seen such pictures, it is one of the most interesting and beautiful things you will ever see. So to sum it up: Special effects, top notch, really well done.
Everyone's Favorite: Actors and Actresses;
Lets start with our Superman: Henry Cavil. What I find most surprising for someone in such a high profile role is how short his career has been up until this point. His first credited role was in an Italian Thriller/Drama called Laguna in 2001. The following year he jumped over to the states to play the role of Albert Mondego in The Count of Monte Cricto. After many more minor international roles and a couple T.V. series he landed his biggest role yet in the 2011 release of Immortals where he played Theseus. Almost coming out of the blue this new handsome and quiet version of everyone's favorite reporter Clark Kent was a smash hit with audiences. I give this guys a huge thumbs up, I hope he plans on staying in the US for his next film.
Next our reporter Lois Lane played by: Amy Adams. Many of you 90's fans may recognize her from her first role in the 1999 flick Drop Dead Gorgeous where she played Leslie Miller. She continued to pop up in small TV appearances throughout 2000, "That 70's Show" and "Buffy The Vampire Slayer" to list a few. Flash forward to 2009 and you'll remember her as the spunky Amelia Earhart in Night of The Museum 2. Her role in this movie as the determined reporter of Lois Lane was right up her alley. Amy Adams rocked this role, counteracting Clark Kent's natural quiet air with her feisty personality and you have the perfect combination.
Finally Our Villain, General Zod: Michael Shannon. You may know him as Agent Nelson Van Alden from the popular TV series "Board Walk Empire" or Richard Kuklinski in the 2006 movie The Iceman. Where ever you have seen him, I doubt you've seen him like this. His role as General Zod gave him a challenge to become such an emotionally intense character. With characters like this its hard for the actors to maintain the same level of intensity or connectivity with their characters emotions. Michael Shannon had no such problem, in fact his acting was so believable I was able to see both points of view, blurring the line of good and evil ever so slightly.
All in all this was an amazing cast of actors and actresses and I do hope they stay in the business for a while. These are all people who I would be honored to work with one day.
Next our reporter Lois Lane played by: Amy Adams. Many of you 90's fans may recognize her from her first role in the 1999 flick Drop Dead Gorgeous where she played Leslie Miller. She continued to pop up in small TV appearances throughout 2000, "That 70's Show" and "Buffy The Vampire Slayer" to list a few. Flash forward to 2009 and you'll remember her as the spunky Amelia Earhart in Night of The Museum 2. Her role in this movie as the determined reporter of Lois Lane was right up her alley. Amy Adams rocked this role, counteracting Clark Kent's natural quiet air with her feisty personality and you have the perfect combination.
Finally Our Villain, General Zod: Michael Shannon. You may know him as Agent Nelson Van Alden from the popular TV series "Board Walk Empire" or Richard Kuklinski in the 2006 movie The Iceman. Where ever you have seen him, I doubt you've seen him like this. His role as General Zod gave him a challenge to become such an emotionally intense character. With characters like this its hard for the actors to maintain the same level of intensity or connectivity with their characters emotions. Michael Shannon had no such problem, in fact his acting was so believable I was able to see both points of view, blurring the line of good and evil ever so slightly.
All in all this was an amazing cast of actors and actresses and I do hope they stay in the business for a while. These are all people who I would be honored to work with one day.
Scene Changes and Transitions: Hold Onto Your Hats;
Artistry in transitions and the overall flow of the movie are huge important factors when it comes to both writing and editing a film. The transitions need to make sense, but they can't be too choppy, the movie needs to be understood but it can't be too long. These are all factors that are looked at when scene changes or transitions occur. In Man of Steel there are many flash backs to Clark Kent's childhood. These can always be hard to show in a movie, because unlike in a comic where a heading can say "ten years ago" a movie doesn't have that kind of freedom if it wishes to stay realistic. This was the biggest challenge to the movies director, Zack Snyder, who had envisioned a realistic theme for the movie. Despite the challenge the flashbacks where incorporated with the story line, corresponding to what was happening in the movie showing a similar situation in Clark's past or providing reasoning for his present actions. This gave the audience a connection that either already has or will come full circle at the end of the film. Outside of the flashbacks the second hardest transitions to make are battle transitions. How to make everything seem smooth and complete despite the fact that there may have been scenes cut out or moved around. Here's the answer: keep the camera moving with the action. very rarely will you see a still shot of a battle in this movie. The camera angles and speed match that of Superman as he plows through buildings and flies between skyscrapers. This gives the battle a logical flow. This is also accomplished through multiple points of view, some civilian and some hero and villain. So not only do you see the battle from an omnipotent view, but also as a civilian on the ground or a reporter for the Daily Planet. Overall the scene changes throughout the movie kept a logical flow, the flashbacks could always be traced to the present by any attentive viewer and the camera movements always kept the audience engaged.
Information Distribution: Understandability;
All I can say in this category is one must pay attention to the film to fully understand everything. In the early moments of the film there are many transitions between past and present. To the inattentive viewer it would be very easy to get confused. Many small things from the past or earlier in the movie WILL come back later, so make sure to pay attention. This is not a movie young children could easily understand, the 7 year old behind me proved that. The farther into the movie the more important it is to recall items from flashbacks and other early points in the movie. Now this isn't to the level of complexity of say Robert Downey Jr's Sherlock Holmes series, but young children will not fully understand why, say Clark Kent, does something if they where not paying attention during the flashback 5 or 10 minutes before. Overall to an adult viewer the story line is easy for even the most novice Superman fan to understand. They set up his back story and his reasoning clearly through a mixture of flashbacks and dialogue that anyone paying attention will be able to catch.
Overall Plot: Comic Fans and Others Rejoice;
Now since I promised not to give any spoilers I will only elaborate on the plot as a whole. This movie serves as a sort of prologue to the Superman that most of us know. It is a story of origin and to those who don't know Superman's back story, this will definitely change that. The plot is easy to follow if you are attentive and honestly very well thought out. Both the hero and the villain's goals are clearly established and explained. I don't really know what else to say, other than go see the movie.
Soundtrack: Another Home Run for Zimmer;
For those of you who may not know the composer of Man of Steel's soundtrack, Hans Zimmer he is best known for his music in: Pirates of the Caribbean: The Curse of the Black Pearl, The Lion King, The Dark Knight, and Inception. Hans Zimmer is one of my favorite composers because of his ability to tell the movie's story though his music. If you listen to his tracks with out the film you can still visualize Jack Sparrow's drunken stumbling or the emotional distress of Batman, and now the amazing flight of Superman. The music in this movie is beautifully incorporated not overpowering but just enough to add intensity to the battles. This is another gorgeous track by Mr. Zimmer and is sure to be added to my favorite play list when released. This is the man who is right now number one of my list of people I wish to work with in my future as a movie maker, I would consider it a great honor for his music to accompany any work of mine.
Other Factors: Almost Time for me to Wrap This Up;
The biggest factor one should be aware of when going to see this movie is that it is LONG. This movie a is a whopping 2 hours and 23 minutes. I hope your movie seat is comfortable because you wont want to leave it. This movie is so engaging and every scene is of some importance so the best advise would be, don't drink too much, you will not want to miss a second of this film, sit farther back, it will give you a wider view of the screen so you won't have to keep looking back and forth during the battles, and DON'T BRING VERY YOUNG CHILDREN, I have addressed this problem many times. If the movie rating isn't enough to discourage you from bring your 6 year old take into account that this movie is one that requires the audiences full attention. If you don't feel that your child's attention span can last the whole 2 hours then please don't bring them. As I mentioned before I had to sit in front of a very talkative and inattentive 7 year old and it doesn't help anyone's movie experience. You are their parent so the final choice is up to you, but I will say you are ones who know your child best. If you know they cannot last through the entire movie, then why waste your money? This is just my opinion, I hope you don't mind.
Credits;
All the information I gave here, including actor histories, rating, and length can all be found on IMDB.com (internet movie data base). Also all of this is MY personal opinion. If you disagree feel free to tell me BUT EXPLAIN WHY. I will not respond to any negative comments with out explanation.
I hope you all go out to see Man of Steel and I sincerely hope you are able to enjoy this film as I was.
No comments:
Post a Comment